My opinions is the page where I write about things that concern me about England. Every month I will choose a subject that concerns me and give my opinions about it. Any visitor to the site can then either write a short comment about the subject I have chosen, and it will be placed in the Visitor's Comments page, or join the blogs page and write something there that others can respond to. Only constructive criticisms will be accepted. Any hostile or abusive comments will be immediately placed in the bin (recycle bin).
Open Borders. (2nd February 2009)
In a totally free society open borders would be a wonderful thing. However, in the real world open borders cause as many problems as it does solutions, if not more. On mainland Europe, there are many countries next to each other, all with their own laws, customs and traditions, and yet there seems to be an underlying common attitude to crossing borders in a way that does not exist in an island culture.
In Great Britain, there has always been three countries submerged under a tenuous veil of unity since 1707 and the forming of the British Union. Over the intervening years, until 1997 and the emergence of the Scottish led NEW LABOUR, that unity was as strong as it ever could be. No one new, including many Scots, the level of discomfort that was within that small band of Scottish movers and shakers in Scottish society, at the continuance of a union that was never wanted and are now in a position to destroy. With the initiation of devolution their nefarious objectives can be achieved. At the moment the borders between Scotland, England and Wales are merely lines on a map. Yet how soon will the border north of England go from ink to stone and wire fencing, with border control points to boot? There is a saying;
In order to undermine Britain, you must first undermine England,
To destroy Britain, Scotland or England must go for independence.
Well if the SNP get their way the second objective will be achieved. Yet, are they alone in their support for Scotland over and above any other part of the union? If we take the first part of the saying above, how can you undermine a nation without destroying it totally? And why do you need to undermine England? Well, firstly England is the largest territory within Britain and has by far the largest indigenous population than any other part of Britain. Secondly, England is the power house of Britain and has always been so since the creation of the union. Thirdly, the best way to undermine a small country like England is to fill it full of foreigners, in particular the Open Door Immigration Policy.
While I'm not against immigration in principle, uncontrolled immigration allows to many people into a country that cannot cope with such a flood. This is bound to upset the locals. And if such a policy is part of a much wider action, deliberately created to undermine the society in which we live, a new picture begins to emerge. If you want to use immigration as a way to help your economy to grow in a global or non global way, then an open door immigration policy makes no sense. Whereas a controlled immigration policy does, because then you can target specific parts of the economy by letting in those immigrants that can fill that workspace, linked to that part of the economy that your indigenous workforce cannot fill. You only let those in that you need, and no one else.
That is why there is such a fuss over Italian and Portuguese workers being brought into England by TOTAL. Since there was enough people in England to fill those jobs at TOTAL, it was never necessary to bring in the Italian and Portuguese workforce in the first place. I suspect that European legislation has more to do with it than anything else. Even so, in this year of recession TOTAL should have known better. Gordon Brown and New Labour? How can we not suspect their motives in allowing such a thing to happen. How many red lined parts of sovereignty have we lost to Europe since the Scottish led, New Labour came to power? How long will it be before we are pushed into full European Union membership without Gordon Brown giving us a say in the matter.
Open borders? If were not careful, we'll be pushed out of our country right into the Irish Sea. Scotland will have it's independence, and the European Union will finally get it's hands on the one nation it could not conquer, ENGLAND.
Of course, these are only my opinions, what do you think?
Devolved Parliament ? (18th April 2009)
A very subtle change has taken place that almost anyone in the UK has not noticed. For all of 2008 the Scottish parliament was known as just that, a parliament or more correctly a devolved parliament. So how is it that all of a sudden it is now called a government? For anyone who want to know, a devolved parliament has limited powers to politically administer a given area of land (with people on it), within a country, and to control various social and local political matters on behalf of that land under the greater control of a higher 'government'. It is not in and of itself a government. A government is a political body that exercises full political and social powers over an entire country. So why was the Scottish devolved parliament referred to several times this month on the BBC as the Scottish Government? When did the Scottish devolved parliament become a government? Has Scotland just become independent without telling anyone? Or is this an attempt to start grooming Scotland and (psychologically), the rest of us for Scottish independence?
I don't think that Gordon Brown or the rest of the Scottish content of the British Government have any interest in any other part of Britain, though they pretend to do so. They are more interested in what part of England they can sell off to the EU, while at the same time feathering their nests in Scotland. As to the largely English MP's in the New Labour Government that blindly support Browns doctrine, there is a word to describe them ???
Of course, these are only my opinions, what do you think?
